MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413439424 · doi:10.1007/s11482-025-10486-2

Positive and Negative Emotional Experiences in Adolescents across 32 Countries: Cross-National and Gender Differences

2025· article· en· W4413439424 on OpenAlexaff
Veljko Jovanović, Sabirah Adams, Rebeca Aritio Solana, Christ Billy Aryanto, Andreja Avsec, Ali Bakhshi, Michael Bender, Sophie Berjot, Sonia Betancourth Zambrano, Andreja Brajša‐Žganec, Yunier Broche‐Pérez, Carmen Buzea, Rosario Cabello, Rosalinda Cassibba, Judith Cavazos‐Arroyo, Fatemeh Daemi, Diego D. Díaz‐Guerra, Marija Džida, Mona Eidelsburger, Pablo Fernández‐Berrocal, Evelyn Fernández Castillo, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, Tomasz Frąckowiak, Teresa Freire, Vesna Gavrilov‐Jerković, Biljana Gjoneska, Jesús Manuel Guerrero Alcedo, Md Jamil Hossain, Jessie Hillekens, Stefan Höfer, Naved Iqbal, Szilvia Jámbori, Mohsen Joshanloo, Ljiljana Kaliterna Lipovčan, Tina Kavčič, Marta Kowal, Marija Krstevska Taseva, Kwok Kit Tong, Milica Lazić, Denisse Manrique‐Millones, Alessia Mariano, Michał Misiak, Pasquale Musso, Vojana Obradović, Javier Ortuño Sierra, Ioana Emanuela Orzea, Ahmet Özaslan, Joonha Park, Marija Pašić, Rasa Pilkauskaitė Valickienė, Rogelio Puente‐Díaz, Lizbeth Puerta‐Sierra, Gordana Ristevska Dimitrovska, S. Craig Roberts, Puji Tania Ronauli, Shazly Savahl, Danielius Serapinas, Sok Ian Kuan, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Piotr Sorokowski, Dijana Sulejmanović, Sze Man Yuen, Erzsébet Szél, Dušana Šakan, Henri Tilga, Aleksandar Tomašević, Wenceslao Unanue, Jesús Unanue, Marieke van Egmond, Murat Yıldırım, Gaja Zager Kocjan, Laura Zamarian, Marija Zotović

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Research in Quality of Life · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFoundation for Science and TechnologyScience Fund of the Republic of SerbiaJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSFundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej
KeywordsQuality of Life ResearchPsychologyDemographic economicsClinical psychologyMedicinePublic healthEconomicsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueApplied Research in Quality of LifeSame topicPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207