MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413445103 · doi:10.2196/70200

Prediction of 1-Year Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Hierarchical Machine Learning Approach

2025· article· en· W4413445103 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Livia Lilli, Laura Antenucci, Augusta Ortolan, Silvia Laura Bosello, Stefano Patarnello, Carlotta Masciocchi, Marco Gorini, G. Castellino, Alfredo Cesario, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino, Jacopo Lenkowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicineComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic disease characterized by a broad spectrum of involved organs, including neurological, renal, and vascular domains, with disease activity manifesting through unpredictable patterns that vary across individuals and over time, making the prediction of activity events particularly challenging. Objective: This paper proposes a hierarchical machine learning model to predict a 12-month SLE activity, defined as the occurrence of at least one event among SLE hospitalization, new organ-involved domain, and neurological, renal, or vascular manifestation within the following year. At each patient's visit, the model considers all the features at the current time point, the information about the patient's clinical history, and about its last 12 months, to predict the outcome for the next 12 months. Methods: The study cohort consists of 262 patients with at least an outpatient visit and an SLE admission from 2012 to 2020, at the Italian Gemelli Hospital, comprising a retrospective longitudinal dataset of 5962 contacts. The data include demographics, laboratory, clinical features (eg, domain involvements and manifestations), treatments, and pathways (eg, contact types as outpatients, hospitalizations, day hospitals, and visit frequency). The variables consider 3 time ranges: features about the current contact and the last 12 months, and the previous patient's clinical history. The main model was developed by testing different machine learning approaches within a cross-validation setup. The predicted probability outputs were used in a risk stratification analysis, identifying 3 groups of predictions: strong, moderate, and mild. Mild samples were then passed through a second cascade model. The integration of the main model (applied to strong and moderate samples) with the cascade model (applied to mild contacts) forms our final hierarchical model. Results: The hierarchical model, resulting from the ensemble of the main random forest and cascade decision tree, demonstrated enhanced performance, increasing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.696 (95% CI 0.672-0.719) in the original main model to 0.743 (95% CI 0.717-0.769), particularly for specific patient characteristics. Through the application of explainable artificial intelligence methods, we also identified the key features that significantly influence the model's predictions. Among the 185 collected features, 15 emerged as the most impactful, including age at contact, response to therapy modifications, abnormal laboratory tests, and clinical manifestations. This analysis plays a crucial role in enhancing model transparency, which is essential for fostering the adoption of artificial intelligence in health care settings. Conclusions: Our study introduces an explainable and reliable tool for predicting 1-year SLE activity, supporting physicians with an advanced decision-support system to improve patient management. The model identifies key features that may help characterize patient phenotypes, enabling personalized treatment plans and better outcomes. In addition, the methodology can be generalized for predictive analytics in other chronic autoimmune diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→