MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Privacy-preserving federated unsupervised domain adaptation with application to age prediction from DNA methylation data

2025· article· en· W4413445904 on OpenAlexaff
Cem Ata Baykara, Ali Burak Ünal, Nico Pfeifer, Mete Akgün

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsPrivy Council Office
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsComputer scienceAdaptation (eye)DNA methylationDomain (mathematical analysis)Data miningComputational biologyBiologyGeneticsGeneMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Generalizing machine learning models across small, high-dimensional, and heterogeneous biological datasets remains a critical challenge due to domain shifts caused by variations in data collection, population differences, and privacy constraints that restrict data sharing. Existing federated domain adaptation (FDA) approaches primarily rely on deep learning and focus on classification tasks, making them unsuitable for privacy-sensitive, small-scale regression problems in biomedical research. We introduce a privacy-preserving federated method for unsupervised domain adaptation in regression, enabling robust learning across distributed, high-dimensional datasets while maintaining full data privacy. RESULTS: Our method is the first to enable distributed training of Gaussian processes for domain adaptation, ensuring complete privacy through randomized encoding and secure aggregation. Unlike deep learning-based FDA approaches, our method is specifically designed for small-scale, high-dimensional biological data, overcoming prior limitations in scalability and generalization. We evaluate our approach on age prediction from DNA methylation data, demonstrating that it achieves performance comparable to non-private state-of-the-art methods while fully preserving data privacy. This work enables secure and effective cross-institutional collaboration in biomedical research without requiring raw data sharing. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for our method is available at https://github.com/mdppml/FREDA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207