MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413446683 · doi:10.1016/j.jics.2025.102008

Machine learning-assisted in silico discovery of PDE10A Inhibitors: Integration of QSAR modeling, docking and MD simulations

2025· article· en· W4413446683 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashutosh Kharwar, Carlos A. Velázquez‐Martínez, Anjani K. Tiwari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Indian Chemical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBabasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar UniversityScience and Engineering Research BoardCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsQuantitative structure–activity relationshipChemistryIn silicoDocking (animal)Computational biologyStereochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interest in phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibitors has been steadily increasing, particularly for their potential in the treatment of schizophrenia. While medicinal chemists have made considerable efforts to design effective inhibitors with minimal side effects, none have been approved for neurodegenerative disorders. This may be due to current research gaps in this field. In this study, we used an In silico approach to evaluate 69 novel pyrimidine derivatives as PDE10A inhibitors, using a QSAR approach. The results of this study showed an R 2 = 0.9097, CCCtr = 0.9527, R 2 Yscr = 0.1022 R2ext = 0.8353. The best generated models encompass five important variables, including ATSC8m, ATSC3e, MATS3s, SHCsats, and WPATH. The parameters including the mass, Sanderson electronegativities, I-state, Weiner path number and saturated carbon played an important role in designing new lead compounds. Based on the above data, we have designed 10 compounds and predicted their activity as PDE10A inhibitors; the highest-ranking compounds were further studied using molecular docking protocols with PDE10A protein sequence reported in the protein data bank (PDB ID 2OVY). The best 6 compounds showing a good inhibitory profile with strong binding interactions in the active site of 2OVY were additionally studied using predictive models of ADMET and DFT, and the results showed an increased stability in the drug complexes due to a larger HOMO-LUMO gap. MD simulations over 100ns further validated the stability of the best complexes (A2, A4 and A9) via RMSD, RMSF, Rg and SASA analyses. Notably, these compounds maintained stable interactions with key active-site residues such as Phe283, Phe254, and Ile246 throughout the simulation, reinforcing their binding stability. Based on these findings, compounds A2, A4 and A9 are proposed as promising leads for further in vitro and in vivo validation as PDE10A inhibitors for schizophrenia treatment. • A validated QSAR model was developed to predict PDE10A inhibitory activity of novel pyrimidine derivatives. • Five key molecular descriptors were identified as major contributors to activity prediction. • Designed compounds demonstrated strong binding affinity and favorable interactions in molecular docking studies. • ADMET, DFT, and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed their drug-like potential and structural stability. • The integrated in silico strategy supports the identification of promising leads for schizophrenia therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Indian Chemical SocietySame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207