MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413450082 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2025-0018

Population genetics and origins of rainbow smelt ( <i>Osmerus mordax</i> ) in the Laurentian Great Lakes

2025· article· en· W4413450082 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kiran Shamir Hazra, Christian A. Therrien, Bryan D. Neff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Geological SurveyOntario GenomicsOntario Genomics InstituteGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologySmeltPopulationCoregonusFisheryPopulation geneticsEcologyZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rainbow smelt ( Osmerus mordax) is a small predatory fish first recorded in the Great Lakes in the 1910s. Despite the major ecological and economic impacts of smelt in the Great Lakes, most information on the origins of these populations comes from second-hand accounts written decades after the first smelt were recorded. These accounts are based on circumstantial evidence and include speculation about natural migration and reproduction of smelt in Lake Ontario as well as secondary anthropogenic introductions into the Great Lakes. Here, we use mtDNA sequencing and RFLP to demonstrate that the single, recorded government introduction of smelt to the Great Lakes in Michigan around 1912 accounts for only about half of the ancestry of Great Lakes smelt. The remaining ancestry appears to be from an anadromous source population. Furthermore, the absence of a longitudinal cline in haplotype frequency indicates that gene flow and dispersal are high amongst smelt populations in the Great Lakes. Our results suggest multiple invasion pathways within the Great Lakes and provide insights into the genetic diversity of the extant Great Lakes populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→