MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

National income inequality and adolescent chronic pain: a time series analysis of 29 countries

2025· article· en· W4413451653 on OpenAlexafffund
Josep Roman‐Juan, Richelle Mychasiuk, Gary J. Macfarlane, Anna Hood, Mélanie Noël

Bibliographic record

VenuePain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInequalitySeries (stratigraphy)Chronic painEconomic inequalityTime seriesMedicineEconomicsPhysical therapyStatisticsMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Chronic pain is a major public health concern in adolescence. It is not evenly distributed across the population, with higher prevalence among adolescents from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Evidence suggests that countries with greater income inequality report worse adolescent health and wider socioeconomic health disparities. However, international research on the role of national income inequality in shaping adolescent chronic pain remains limited. In this study, we examined whether national income inequality was associated with adolescent chronic pain prevalence and chronic pain-related socioeconomic disparities, and whether changes in income inequality over time corresponded to changes in these outcomes. Data were drawn from adolescents across 29 Western countries/regions that participated in 5 waves (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018) of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children surveys (pooled n = 826,563). Chronic pain and SES data were aggregated to create a country-level slope index of inequality and then combined with country-level national income inequality data. Prais-Winsten time-series regression models with panel-corrected standard errors were conducted. Results showed that higher national income inequality was associated with a higher prevalence of chronic pain (B = 0.303; P < 0.001) and greater chronic pain-related socioeconomic disparities (B = 0.003; P < 0.001). In addition, changes in national income inequality over successive survey years were associated with changes in chronic pain-related socioeconomic disparities (B = 0.004; P = 0.014). The study findings highlight the need for policies addressing structural income inequality and for integrating socioeconomic factors, social support, and community resources into interventions and treatments to reduce chronic pain prevalence and eliminate related disparities, especially among adolescents from lower SES backgrounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePainSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207