MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413452361 · doi:10.3390/prosthesis7050105

Development of a Powered Four-Bar Prosthetic Hip Joint Prototype

2025· article· en· W4413452361 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Botros, Hossein Gholizadeh, Farshad Golshan, David Langlois, Natalie Baddour, Edward D. Lemaire

Bibliographic record

VenueProsthesis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMitacsÖssurUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsBar (unit)Joint (building)Computer scienceEngineeringOrthodonticsEngineering drawingPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineGeologyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Hip-level amputees face ambulatory challenges due to the lack of a lower limb and prosthetic hip power. Some hip-level amputees restore mobility by using a prosthesis with hip, knee, and ankle joints. Powered prosthetic joints contain an actuator that provides external flexion-extension moments to assist with movement. Powered knee and powered ankle-foot units are on the market, but no viable powered hip unit is commercially available. This research details the development of a novel powered four-bar prosthetic hip joint that can be integrated into a full-leg prosthesis. Methods: The hip joint design consisted of a four-bar linkage with a harmonic drive DC motor placed in the inferior link and an additional linkage to transfer torque from the motor to the hip center of rotation. Link lengths were determined through engineering optimization. Device strength was demonstrated with force and finite element analysis and with ISO 15032:2000 A100 static compression tests. Walking tests with a wearable hip-knee-ankle-foot prosthesis simulator, containing the novel powered hip, were conducted with three able-bodied participants. Each participant walked back and forth on a level 10 m walkway. Custom hardware and software captured joint angles. Spatiotemporal parameters were determined from video clips processed in the Kinovea software (ver. 0.9.5). Results: The powered hip passed all force and finite element checks and ISO 15032:2000 A100 static compression tests. The participants, weighing 96 ± 2 kg, achieved steady gait at 0.45 ± 0.11 m/s with the powered hip. Participant kinematic gait profiles resembled those seen in transfemoral amputee gait. Some gait asymmetries occurred between the sound and prosthetic legs. No signs of mechanical failure were seen. Most design requirements were met. Areas for powered hip improvement include hip flexion range, mechanical advantage at high hip flexion, and device mass. Conclusions: The novel powered four-bar hip provides safe level-ground walking with a full-leg prosthesis simulator and is viable for future testing with hip-level amputees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProsthesisSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207