Development of a Powered Four-Bar Prosthetic Hip Joint Prototype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Hip-level amputees face ambulatory challenges due to the lack of a lower limb and prosthetic hip power. Some hip-level amputees restore mobility by using a prosthesis with hip, knee, and ankle joints. Powered prosthetic joints contain an actuator that provides external flexion-extension moments to assist with movement. Powered knee and powered ankle-foot units are on the market, but no viable powered hip unit is commercially available. This research details the development of a novel powered four-bar prosthetic hip joint that can be integrated into a full-leg prosthesis. Methods: The hip joint design consisted of a four-bar linkage with a harmonic drive DC motor placed in the inferior link and an additional linkage to transfer torque from the motor to the hip center of rotation. Link lengths were determined through engineering optimization. Device strength was demonstrated with force and finite element analysis and with ISO 15032:2000 A100 static compression tests. Walking tests with a wearable hip-knee-ankle-foot prosthesis simulator, containing the novel powered hip, were conducted with three able-bodied participants. Each participant walked back and forth on a level 10 m walkway. Custom hardware and software captured joint angles. Spatiotemporal parameters were determined from video clips processed in the Kinovea software (ver. 0.9.5). Results: The powered hip passed all force and finite element checks and ISO 15032:2000 A100 static compression tests. The participants, weighing 96 ± 2 kg, achieved steady gait at 0.45 ± 0.11 m/s with the powered hip. Participant kinematic gait profiles resembled those seen in transfemoral amputee gait. Some gait asymmetries occurred between the sound and prosthetic legs. No signs of mechanical failure were seen. Most design requirements were met. Areas for powered hip improvement include hip flexion range, mechanical advantage at high hip flexion, and device mass. Conclusions: The novel powered four-bar hip provides safe level-ground walking with a full-leg prosthesis simulator and is viable for future testing with hip-level amputees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".