MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Photon Number Resolution via Multi-Photon Subtraction in a Waveguide-QED Setting

2025· article· en· W4413456740 on OpenAlexaff
Abdolreza Pasharavesh, Sai Sreesh Venuturumilli, Michal Bajcsy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonPhysicsSubtractionWaveguideOpticsResolution (logic)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A description of states of light in terms of photons allows for a clear delineation between classical and non-classical light. The development of single-photon sources and detectors has enabled experimental studies of quantum light at the single-photon level, proving essential for applications in quantum communication, sensing, and imaging. Multi-photon quantum states, existing in higher-dimensional spaces, extend these applications and open opportunities to study the rich space of non-classical light states. Platforms for sourcing and characterizing such states have been increasingly explored to leverage the quantum resources they offer. Arithmetic operations of photon addition and subtraction, allow for generating non-classical multi-photon light from classical sources like coherent and squeezed states, as well as for photon-number-resolved (PNR) detection. PNR detection is essential for characterizing multi-photon states,providing access to their photon-number distributions and higher-order correlations, and enabling advanced quantum tomography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Information and Cryptography→French-language works237,207→