MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413465122 · doi:10.47990/nf72ba86

Assessing Dental Students’ Emotions While Treating Uncooperative Children: A Pilot Study

2025· article· en· W4413465122 on OpenAlexaff
Ida Kornerup, Sharon M. Compton, Qi Guo, Mark J. Gierl, Hollis Lai, Karla Carpio Horta, Raisa Queiroz Catunda, Mehdi Salehizeinabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Odontopediatría Latinoamericana · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLikert scaleAnxietyDescriptive statisticsGraduation (instrument)PopulationMedicinePsychologyClinical psychologyFamily medicineMedical educationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Dental students often face emotional challenges when managing uncooperative pediatric patients, which may lead to reduced interest in treating children post-graduation, limiting access to pediatric dental care. Objective: This study aimed to examine dental students' emotional experiences while treating uncooperative children and their perceptions of the training provided on behavioral management techniques. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional survey-based pilot study was conducted at an urban, university-affiliated dental clinic during the 2017-2018 academic year. The target population consisted of 41 third-year dental students in their first year of clinical rotations, from which 29 students completed the survey. Informed consent was obtained, emphasizing voluntary participation or withdrawal. Students were invited to complete an 18-question Likert-scale survey. Access was restricted to their unique university emails, ensuring participation integrity. To avoid academic pressure, a research assistant administered the survey. The survey included questions adapted from established tools such as the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and validated by two pediatric dentistry experts. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and path analysis to explore relationships between stress, training adequacy, and behavioral management perceptions. Results: A majority (75.9%) of students reported stress while treating uncooperative children, with 58.6% experiencing anxiety and 69.0% frustration. Additionally, 13.8% expressed concerns about harming the child. While 51.7% were satisfied with their treatment outcomes, 65.5% indicated needing further behavioral management training. Conclusion: This study highlighted significant stress and anxiety among managing uncooperative pediatric patients. Enhanced training in behavioral management and increased clinical exposure are essential to prepare students for practice confidently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Odontopediatría LatinoamericanaSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207