MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413465854 · doi:10.1063/5.0280833

Aspect ratio effects on flow past a bed-mounted emergent cylinder

2025· article· en· W4413465854 on OpenAlexafffund
Vesselina Roussinova, Ram Balachandar

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsMechanicsFlow (mathematics)CylinderFlow visualizationAspect ratio (aeronautics)Aerospace engineeringClassical mechanicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wake characteristics of an emergent bed-mounted circular cylinder of diameter d are investigated for intermediate aspect ratios located within a fully developed turbulent boundary layer using particle image velocimetry. The Reynolds number based on flow depth (H) and bulk velocity (Um) is 24 700, and the aspect ratio (AR), defined as the ratio of H/d, is varied from 1.7 to 6.7. The impact of AR on time-averaged flow statistics including mean velocity, Reynolds stresses, flow anisotropy, and two-point correlations was analyzed in the vertical central plane and across three spanwise planes. This study builds upon the earlier work of Heidari et al. [Phys. Fluids 29(6), 065111 (2017)], which investigated an emergent, bed-mounted cylinder with AR = 11. The results reveal that the flow topology and coherent structures in the wake are influenced by AR across all measurement planes. In the low AR cases, detached reverse flow regions were observed near the bed, as bed friction interferes with the formation of the von Kármán vortex street. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) reveals a decrease in energy content in the near-bed plane with increasing AR consistent with enhanced small-scale activity. In contrast, the trend is reversed in the mid-depth and near-free surface planes, where turbulent kinetic energy becomes concentrated in the low-order modes as AR increases. Furthermore, for AR = 1.7, the POD modes are highly correlated throughout the flow depth, whereas higher AR cases show weaker correlations, indicating complex flow structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207