MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integrating Multi-Input Data in CNN-LSTM Models for AI-Based Cooking Termination in Smart Ovens

2025· article· en· W4413468553 on OpenAlexaff
Mustafa E. Kamaşak, Zeki Bilgin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData modelingReal-time computingDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an AI-powered smart oven system is proposed, which can automatically terminate the cooking process based on user preferences (rare, regular, or well-done). A camera-integrated oven prototype was developed for five different food types (fresh pizza, frozen pizza, tray pastry, mini pastry, and salmon), and a comprehensive dataset was created using images captured throughout the cooking process. Visual data were subjected to feature extraction using image processing techniques, and the resulting features were combined with numerical inputs such as temperature and cooking time to form the input of an LSTM-based deep learning model. The model was evaluated using both the collected dataset and real-world user scenarios, and was shown to perform with high accuracy. The developed system adapts to individual cooking preferences, prevents overcooking, and contributes to energy efficiency and reduction of food waste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207