MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413472073 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2025.3601822

Decoupled Current Control of Grid-Tied VSIs Using Real-Time Impedance Angle Compensation

2025· article· en· W4413472073 on OpenAlexafffund
Armita Fatemimoghadam, Ibrahim Amezyane, Carlos Viana, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsElectrical impedanceCompensation (psychology)GridCurrent (fluid)Control theory (sociology)Control (management)Materials scienceElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an impedance angle compensation (IAC)-based current control strategy for voltage source inverters (VSIs), to improve dynamic performance and mitigate cross-axis coupling under varying interface impedance, a common challenge in grid-tied renewable energy systems. Unlike traditional methods that rely on explicitly tuned feed-forward, feed-back, or complex compensators, the proposed approach introduces a real-time transformation based on the interface impedance angle. This transformation normalizes the plant transfer function, enabling conventional PI controllers to maintain high current regulation accuracy with minimal tuning. Experimental results demonstrate that the IAC method reduces overshoot to less than 0.1% and achieves consistent settling times of approximately 17-19 ms, even under ±40% impedance variation. Comparative analysis confirms superior transient response and decoupling performance over existing techniques. Additionally, by leveraging the predictability of the terminal voltage angle, the method ensures direct control trajectories and strong adaptability to real-world operating conditions. With low computational complexity and operational consistency, the IAC strategy presents a practical and scalable solution for grid-tied inverters and high-speed motor drives. This method is designed for single-phase grid-tied inverters and verified through simulation and experimental implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207