MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413478034 · doi:10.63050/jpps.21.04.947

FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH – TIME TO IMPLEMENT SAFIA BANO JUDGEMENT?

2024· article· en· W4413478034 on OpenAlexaff
Tariq Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pakistan Psychiatric Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Justice Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthJudgementPsychologyPsychiatryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over 3 years have passed since the landmark Safia Bano Supreme Court judgement. This judgment laid the foundations for capacity building in the area of forensic mental health however there is more work needed to improve the basic understanding of forensic mental health in professionals who interact with the mentally offender on behalf of the courts. In 2023 the Noor Muqaddam case showed that lessons from Safia Bano seemed not to have been completely implemented. However, there has been some progress in this area and the need for legislative changes to add accountability in implementing the historical Safia Bano judgement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pakistan Psychiatric SocietySame topicLegal and Social Justice StudiesFrench-language works237,207