MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413480376 · doi:10.3390/atmos16091001

Wind-Induced Water Transport and Circulation Structure in the Laptev Sea–East Siberian Sea

2025· article· en· W4413480376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiangyun Liu, Yanjun Wu, Xiaoyu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmosphere · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsClimatologyCirculation (fluid dynamics)OceanographyWater circulationEnvironmental scienceGeologyAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variability in the Laptev Sea–East Siberian Sea circulation system modulates freshwater circulation in the Arctic Ocean, yet details of these wind-driven mechanisms remain poorly understood. Based on in situ observations from the 2018 Sino-Russian joint Arctic expedition, this study investigates the modulatory influence of wind on circulation structures and freshwater transport in the study area and examines the long-term variation characteristics of this circulation and its inherent connection with the Arctic wind. In situ measurements confirm two freshwater transport pathways: a coastal-current route and a geostrophic slope-current route. As the Beaufort High moves toward the Canadian Basin, it shifts wind patterns from anticyclonic to cyclonic, which regulates the transport of shelf water by influencing the prevailing wind direction. Furthermore, our analysis identifies two main modes of long-term changes in summer surface circulation: the first mode characterizes the coastal-current architecture, while the second mode delineates slope-current configurations. Crucially, large-scale modes of the Arctic wind play an important role in regulating circulation. Its first mode corresponds to the summer anticyclonic circulation pattern of the Arctic Ocean Oscillation, which drives the eastward strengthening of the coastal current, while the third mode presents a mechanism similar to the Arctic Dipole, which promotes the development of the slope current by enhancing the convergence of the polar current and wind. This has led to the long-term strengthening of the slope current.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmosphereSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207