MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413482204 · doi:10.1177/0145482x251365267

Causes of Blindness and Low Vision in Schools for Students With Visual Impairments in Tehran

2025· article· en· W4413482204 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Ahmadieh, Narsis Daftarian, Mojtaba Vand Rajabpour, Bahareh Kheiri, Kourosh Sheibani, Amir Moradi, Hamideh Sabbaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlindnessLow visionPsychologyOptometryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Childhood visual impairment is a global concern. We aimed to identify the major causes of childhood visual impairment in schools for students with visual impairments in Tehran, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on students attending two schools for students with visual impairments in Tehran. All students or their guardians were interviewed to record their past medical history. Students underwent comprehensive ocular examinations, including assessment of presenting visual acuity, eye fixation status, color vision, external ocular exam, and examinations of anterior and posterior ocular segments. The classification of visual impairment was conducted based on the definitions provided by the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases, and the exact cause of visual impairment was recorded. Results: A total of 134 students, whose average age was 13.52 ± 2.9 years (range, 7 to 18 years) and who were primarily female (56.7%), participated. More than 82.8% of participants had blindness (1.3 to 3.1 LogMAR, < 3/60), 4.4% had severe visual impairment (1.0 to 1.3 LogMAR; 3/60-6/60), and 12.8% had moderate visual impairment (0.48 to 1.0 LogMAR; 6/60-6/18). The retina (47.1%), optic nerve (17.9%), and whole globe (10.5%) were the most affected anatomical sites, with Leber's congenital amaurosis (a hereditary retinal disorder) being the most prevalent diagnosis (27.8%), followed by optic nerve atrophy (17.9%), congenital glaucoma (9.7%), phthisis eye (5.2%), and microphthalmos (5.2%). We found parental consanguinity in 68.42% of cases with hereditary retinal disorders. Discussion: In the current study, hereditary retinal disorders were among the most prevalent causes of visual impairment, which can be attributed to the high rates of consanguineous marriages in Iran. Implications for Practitioners: The current findings highlight the need to provide an educational program to raise awareness in our society about the hereditary causes of visual impairment, particularly as a potential result of autosomal recessive genetic disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.419 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visual Impairment & BlindnessSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207