MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413488780 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adeb51

CHIME All-sky Multiday Pulsar Stacking Search (CHAMPSS): System Overview and First Discoveries

2025· article· en· W4413488780 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Christopher Andrade, P. J. Boyle, Charanjot Brar, Alyssa Cassity, Kathryn Crowter, Davor Čubranić, Abigail K Denney, Fengqiu Adam Dong, Emmanuel Fonseca, Robert Main, Juan Mena-Parra, Cherry Ng, S. M. Ransom, Kendrick M. Smith, Wenke Xia, Tarik Zegmott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill Space InstituteAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaUniversity of TorontoCanada Foundation for InnovationSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstronomyPulsarSkyAstrophysicsAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We describe the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) All-sky Multiday Pulsar Stacking Search (CHAMPSS) project. This novel radio pulsar survey revisits the full northern sky daily, offering unprecedented opportunity to detect highly intermittent pulsars, as well as faint sources via long-term data stacking. CHAMPSS uses the CHIME/FRB datastream, which consists of 1024 stationary beams streaming intensity data at 0.983 ms resolution, with 16,384 frequency channels across 400–800 MHz, continuously being searched for single, dispersed bursts/pulses. In CHAMPSS, data from adjacent east–west beams are combined to form a grid of tracking beams, allowing longer exposures at fixed positions. These tracking beams are dedispersed to many trial dispersion measures (DM) to a maximum DM beyond the Milky Way’s expected contribution, and Fourier transformed in time to form power spectra. Repeated observations are searched daily to find intermittent sources, and power spectra of the same sky positions are incoherently stacked, increasing sensitivity to faint persistent sources. The 0.983 ms time resolution limits our sensitivity to millisecond pulsars; we have full sensitivity to pulsars with P > 60 ms, with sensitivity gradually decreasing from 60 ms to 2 ms, as higher harmonics are beyond the Nyquist limit. In a commissioning survey, data covering ∼1/16 of the CHIME sky were processed and searched in quasi-realtime over two months, leading to the discovery of 11 new pulsars, each with S 600 > 0.1 mJy. When operating at scale, CHAMPSS will stack >1 yr of data along each sightline, reaching a sensitivity of ≲30 μJy for all sightlines above a decl. of 10°, and off of the Galactic plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→