MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413503479 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v45i2.45838

“Siamo condannati alla pena del desiderio” (Davide). Doppio, androginia, infinito assoluto

2025· article· it· W4413503479 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Massimo Fusillo

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Questo articolo esplora il tema del doppio e il genere dell’autobiografia fittizia, un concetto al centro di un ampio dibattito teorico. L’analisi si concentra in particolare sul romanzo Davide di Coccioli, offrendone una lettura approfondita, soprattutto del dualismo del personaggio biblico e del suo rapporto omoerotico con Gionata. La seconda parte del contributo è dedicata a Le corde dell’arpa, mettendo in luce il tema parallelo dell’androgino, un concetto che scaturisce da una citazione di Garcia Lorca. Attraverso questa analisi, il presente lavoro intende contribuire alla comprensione delle dinamiche complesse tra identità, sessualità e mitologia nella narrativa contemporanea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207