MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413503492 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v45i2.45835

Una “disperata speranza.” Echi kierkegaardiani nel romanzo Il cielo e la terra di Carlo Coccioli

2025· article· it· W4413503492 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miriam Rita Policardo

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicKierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il presente lavoro intende analizzare il romanzo Il cielo e la terra di Carlo Coccioli in relazione ad alcune vicende biografiche dell’autore e in particolar modo in rapporto alla filosofia di Søren Kierkegaard. Nel romanzo di Coccioli si rintracciano alcuni dei temi più cari alla riflessione del filosofo danese: l’angoscia, la disperazione, la fede come tensione, lo svuotamento di sé. Attraverso l’analisi, in special modo, della figura del protagonista del romanzo, don Ardito Piccardi, l’articolo si propone di rintracciare echi di una filosofia esistenzialista nell’opera dell’autore toscano.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.018
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicKierkegaardian Philosophy and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207