MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel ARD-GPR Approach for Li-Ion Battery SoH Estimation Using Frequency Response Analysis

2025· article· en· W4413513957 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround-penetrating radarBattery (electricity)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringRadarPhysicsPower (physics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the use of lithium-ion batteries continues to grow, a large number of these batteries are reaching the end of their first life. Making informed decisions about battery retirement, second-life applications, and fair market value requires an accurate estimation of the battery's state of health (SoH). This paper presents a data-driven method for SoH estimation using features extracted from the frequency response of the battery in the form of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data. A novel model based on Automatic Relevance Determination Gaussian Process Regression (ARDGPR) is proposed, identifying the most important EIS features for accurate SoH prediction. Additionally, the paper introduces the design of a hardware platform capable of real-time EIS measurement and on-board SoH estimation. The proposed approach supports reliable battery health assessment for first- and second-life applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207