MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413514579 · doi:10.24908/cmj.v24i1.19166

Rethinking Firepower and Security Dilemmas in the Era of Climate Change

2024· article· en· W4413514579 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simon Dalby

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Military Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirepowerClimate changePolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsGeographyGeologyPhilosophyArchaeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine generated two simultaneous security crises for NATO: firstly, the obvious military one and, secondly, the energy crisis in Europe.In one sense, these were old issues reigniting fears of Russian intentions on the continent and reminding older residents of fuel supply crises of earlier times related to conflict in the Middle East.But in the context of rapidly advancing scholarship on how the Earth's ecology functions, and the dangerous heat wave worldwide in 2023, massive forest fires in Canada, and record highs in global sea surface temperatures, those old concerns must be supplemented by a clear appreciation of the new dangers that are looming in the immediate future: a third security crisis related to the rapid ecological transformations now underway around the world.Climate change is the most important consideration, but far from the only one as the burgeoning earth system sciences have been making clear in recent years. 1 A Canadian Armed Forces Flight Engineer surveys the wildfires in British Columbia from onboard a CH-147 Chinook helicopter during a reconnaissance flight as part of Operation LENTUS 17-04 in Kamloops British Columbia, on July 12, 2017.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.042
Scholarly communication0.0150.012
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Military Journal→Same topicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration→French-language works237,207→