MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413515358 · doi:10.1093/abm/kaaf068

Bidirectional week-to-week relationships between weekly psychological stress across multiple life domains and engagement with an exercise intervention: secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial

2025· article· en· W4413515358 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin A. Hives, Bruno D. Zumbo, Mark R. Beauchamp, Yan Liu, Eli Puterman

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPsychological interventionHealth psychologyRandomized controlled trialPsychologyIntervention (counseling)Clinical psychologymHealthPhysical activityPhysical therapyMedicinePsychiatryPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Engaging in physical activity can reduce the risk of multiple morbidities and premature mortality. Psychological stress can hinder the development and maintenance of physical activity behaviors. There is a dearth of research on how these two processes interact. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the week-to-week bidirectional associations between weekly psychological stress across multiple domains (e.g. social, economic) and adherence to a six-week mHealth exercise program among a previously inactive sample. METHODS: The secondary analyses reported in this study examine data derived from adults randomized to one of three mobile application(s)-based exercise arms embedded within the COPE trial (N = 251). The interventions delivered to participants in each arm involved six weeks of at-home exercise requiring no additional equipment. Relationships between psychological stress (as measured by a modified version of the Chronic Burden Scale) and engagement with the commercially available exercise apps were explored using a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM). This model simultaneously assessed the longitudinal and bidirectional associations between psychological stress and exercise engagement and vice versa. RESULTS: Both psychological stress and engagement with the exercise interventions demonstrated significant positive autoregressive effects across successive weeks. However, the cross-lagged associations between stress and engagement with the exercise intervention were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: While the cross-lagged effects were non-significant, there was high variability between individuals. Future studies should use larger samples and methods that would allow an examination of an individual's relationship between psychological stress and exercise engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.427
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Behavioral MedicineSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207