Appraisal and Positive Emotion Effect on Consumer Impulse Buying Behaviour Using Mobile Discount
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates the influence of appraisal and positive emotions on consumers’ impulse buying behaviour concerning the use of mobile discount sales promotion techniques. Grounded on both attribution and cognitive appraisal theory, hypotheses were devised based on the relationship between sales discounts to positive psychological responses, resulting in impulse purchases. A closed-ended survey involving 251 consumers who had recently made purchases utilising discount promotions was conducted. The study reveals that consumers’ impulse buying behaviour is positively affected by appraisal attributes, specifically price–quality perception, goal interest and goal importance, associated with discount sales promotions. Moreover, positive emotions are identified as a mediating factor in the relationship between these appraisal attributes and impulse buying behaviour. As the scope of the findings is limited to the mobile discount sales promotion technique, various possibilities for further exploration and expansion of these findings are discussed. Insights derived from this study offer a targeted focus and resource prioritisation in terms of theoretical and managerial implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it