Optimizing Anti-Corrosive Properties of Polyester Powder Coatings Through Montmorillonite-Based Nanoclay Additive and Film Thickness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigates the impact of incorporating montmorillonite-based nanoclay additives on the anti-corrosive properties of a polyester/triglycidyl isocyanurate (polyester/TGIC) powder coating on phosphated steel. The self-repairing capability facilitated by the swelling and expansion of nanoclay was demonstrated to enhance the corrosion resistance of the coatings significantly. A statistical Mixture Design methodology was employed to establish the optimal combination of nanoclay dosage and coating film thickness. Nineteen experiments were conducted using Design of Experiments, and two regression models were developed using the measured polarization resistance (Rp) and specular gloss values as responses. The mathematical maximization of the Rp value predicted an optimal nanoclay dosage of 4.1% with a corresponding film thickness of 80 µm. Statistical and experimental verification validated the results obtained from the regression models. Notably, the optimized coating demonstrated an Rp value one order of magnitude higher than the coating with 4% nanoclay and a standard film thickness of 60 µm. The behavior of the newly developed coatings was analyzed and compared through measurements of open circuit potential, polarization resistance, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The findings confirm the substantial improvement in the anti-corrosive and self-repairing properties of the polyester/TGIC powder coating with the incorporation of montmorillonite-based nanoclay additives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".