Sustainability Index Mapping for Green Building of Vertical Housing in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) Using the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to assess the sustainability status of green buildings for vertical housing in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN).It responds to growing environmental, social, economic, infrastructure, and institutional challenges driven by rapid urban development.Using the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) approach, combined with Monte Carlo simulations, the research evaluates five key dimensions of sustainability: environment, economy, social, infrastructure, and institution.Data were collected from expert respondents through purposive sampling and analyzed using leverage and stress value validation.The findings reveal that the vertical housing model in IKN falls within the highly sustainable category, with strong performance across all assessed dimensions.The study emphasizes the role of green building practices in supporting smart city goals, reducing carbon emissions, and enhancing urban livability.Results are expected to inform policy decisions and contribute to the formulation of effective sustainability strategies in large-scale urban development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it