MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413553514 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3602016

Attention-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Joint Trajectory Planning and Task Offloading in AAV-Assisted Vehicular Edge Computing

2025· article· en· W4413553514 on OpenAlexaff
Han Zhang, Hongbin Liang, Laha Ale, Guotao Mao, Xintao Hong, Qiong Jia, Dongmei Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceJoint (building)Task (project management)TrajectoryEdge computingArtificial intelligenceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDeep learningEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of compute-intensive and delay-sensitive applications in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) has brought new challenges to traditional Vehicle Edge Computing (VEC). Especially during peak traffic periods, fixed base stations (BSs), due to their static deployment and limited coverage, struggle to elastically scale computing resources to meet the dynamically changing computational demands of vehicular users, which to some extent affects the overall quality of service and efficiency of system resource utilization. In this paper, we propose a hybrid edge computing framework that integrates Autonomous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) as mobile computing nodes to complement fixed base stations. For this AAV-BS hybrid edge computing environment, we design and optimize a computation offloading model considering heterogeneous task types and AAV trajectory planning. The proposed model tackles the joint optimization of system revenue, service delay, and energy consumption, while considering practical constraints such as AAV energy limitations and base station capacity. To address this multi-objective optimization challenge, we construct a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model and develop a multi-head self-attention enhanced Multi-Agent Deep Dirichlet Deterministic Policy Gradient (MHSA-MAD3PG) algorithm. The multi-head self-attention mechanism enables agents to capture complex dependencies and interactions in the environment, leading to more effective collaborative decision-making. Comprehensive simulation results demonstrate that our proposed approach achieves superior performance in terms of system revenue, service delay, and energy efficiency compared to baseline methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207