MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Minimizing Total Travel Time for Intelligent EVs with Real-Time Traffic and Charging Constraints

2025· article· en· W4413559315 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Shahed Hossen, Thiago Eustaquio Alves de Oliveira, Dariush Ebrahimi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTravel timeReal-time computingTime travelTransport engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise of electric vehicles (EVs), driven by advances in battery technology and environmental concerns, introduces new challenges in energy-efficient routing. Intelligent electric vehicles (IEVs) hold great promise for smart mobility, but effective routing and charging remain key obstacles. This paper proposes a method to minimize total journey time by accounting for travel, charging, and waiting while integrating real-time traffic data and battery constraints. A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model is developed for optimal routing in small networks, and a scalable heuristic, MT2T (Minimizing Total Travel Time), is introduced for larger scenarios. The approach considers dynamic traffic, charging station booking and cancellation, and battery thresholds. Experimental results show that both methods reduce travel time and support efficient routing for next-generation IEVs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207