MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413560361 · doi:10.1200/cci-25-00105

Machine Learning Model Integrating Computed Tomography Image–Derived Radiomics and Circulating miRNAs to Predict Residual Teratoma in Metastatic Nonseminoma Testicular Cancer

2025· article· en· W4413560361 on OpenAlexaff
Güliz Özgün, Neda Abdalvand, Gizem Özcan, Ka Mun Nip, Nastaran Khazamipour, Arman Rahmim, Robert H. Bell, Corinne Maurice‐Dror, Maryam Soleimani, Kim Chi, Bernhard J. Eigl, Craig R. Nichols, Christian Kollmannsberger, Ren Yuan, Lucia Nappi

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTeratomaRadiologyUnivariate analysisUnivariateGerm cell tumorsPathologyMultivariate analysisInternal medicineChemotherapyMachine learningMultivariate statisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE Chemotherapy is the primary treatment for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (mNSGCTs), but patients often encounter postchemotherapy residual disease. Accurate noninvasive methods are needed to predict the histology of these masses, guiding treatment and reserving surgery for those with teratoma. This study aims to enhance predictive accuracy by integrating computed tomography (CT) radiomics features with miRNAs (miR371-375) to distinguish between teratoma and nonteratoma histology in postchemotherapy residual masses. METHODS We retrospectively identified 111 lesions, divided into training and test sets (n = 78 v 33) with equal class distribution. 3D Slicer was used to segment lesions with a short axis of >10 mm from the postchemo-presurgical CT images, and radiomics features were extracted. Presurgery plasma miR371-375 levels were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Four machine learning models evaluated the predictive value of radiomics alone (R-only) and combined with miR371-375 levels, and the best performer was selected. Clinical factors associated with teratoma from univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis with the best radiomics signature to assess their impact on predicting teratoma histology. RESULTS The CatBoost (CB) model R + 371 + 375 exhibited the best and most robust overall accuracy for predicting residual teratoma, with the highest AUC values (0.96, 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.0 for training, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98 for testing) and a well-balanced sensitivity and specificity. Univariate analysis identified presurgery alpha-fetoprotein ( P = .01), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin ( P = .01), initial teratoma pathology ( P = .01), and lymph node metastases ( P = .02) as significant predictors for teratoma. Multivariate analysis included these features and the radiomics signature, which was the strongest independent predictor ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION Combining miR371-375 with CT radiomics features improves the accuracy of predicting teratoma histology of postchemotherapy residual disease in mNSGCTs and, therefore, has the potential to guide treatment decision making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCO Clinical Cancer InformaticsSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207