MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413564876 · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2025.03.013

Evaluation of Tideglusib as a Disease Modifying Therapy in Murine Models of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

2025· article· en· W4413564876 on OpenAlexaff
Nipun Malhotra, Omer Cavus, John Bobik, Kai-Xiang You, S Takenaka, Danielle Abdallah, Steve Antwi-Boasiako, Nathaniel P. Murphy, Holly Sucharski-Argall, Xianyao Xu, Stephen P. Chelko, Thomas J. Hund, Jason D. Roberts, Peter J. Mohler, Mona El Refaey

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Basic to Translational Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFondation LeducqOhio State University
KeywordsCardiomyopathyMedicineCardiologyDiseaseHeart failureInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited heart disease, and current pharmacological therapies are directed toward the management of electrical manifestations. To date, none address the underlying pathophysiology of this progressive condition. We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of Tideglusib (TD) in Ank2 cardio-selective-knockout and homozygous desmoglein-2 mutant ACM mouse models. TD was able to prevent and reverse the reduced cardiac function in treated mice. Moreover, TD-treated adult mice displayed a reduction in ventricular arrhythmia following adrenergic stimulation. We provide compelling preclinical data for TD as a potential therapy for patients with ACM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Basic to Translational ScienceSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207