Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study proposes new entropy of the apparent horizon , where is the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. As parameter one comes to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. This allows to consider the generalized Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) equations for the barotropic matter fluid with for arbitrary equation of state parameter . The modified Friedmann's equations are found. The addition term in the second modified Friedmann's equation plays the role of a dynamical cosmological constant. The dark energy density, pressure, and the deceleration parameter are found. It is shown that at some parameters and , two phases can be obtained, acceleration and deceleration or the eternal inflation. The model under consideration by using the holographic principle can describe the universe inflation and late time of the universe acceleration. Thus, the holographic dark energy model with the generalized entropy of the apparent horizon is considered. It is shown that entropic cosmology with the entropy proposed is equivalent to cosmology based on the teleparallel gravity with the function . New cosmology based on the generalized entropy can be of interest for a description of inflation and late time of the universe evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".