Enhanced diabetes prediction using skip-gated recurrent unit with gradient clipping approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder categorized using hyperglycemia that results from the body's inability to adequately secrete and respond to insulin. Disease prediction using various machine learning (ML) approaches has gained attention because of its potential for early detection. However, it is a challenging task for ML-based algorithms to capture the long-term dependencies like glucose levels in the diabetes data. Hence, this research developed the skip-gated recurrent unit (Skip-GRU) with gradient clipping (GC) approach which is a deep learning (DL)-based approach to predict diabetes effectively. The Skip-GRU network effectively captures the long-term dependencies, and it ignores the unnecessary features and provides only the relevant features for diabetes prediction. The GC technique is used during the training process of the Skip-GRU network that mitigates the exploding gradients issue and helps to predict diabetes effectively. The proposed Skip-GRU with GC approach achieved 98.23% accuracy on a PIMA dataset and 97.65% accuracy on a LMCH dataset. The proposed approach effectively predicts diabetes compared with the existing conventional ML-based approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".