The Impact of Cybersecurity, IT Spending, and Innovation on Economic Growth in 2023
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study seeks to examine the influence of cyber security, IT expenditure, and innovation on economic development across a sample of 30 nations, utilizing cross-sectional data from 2023.This is happening because the digital transition is speeding up and digital variables are playing a bigger role in supporting global economic growth.The study employed a quantitative analytical framework, utilizing the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method with EViews12 to assess the correlation between the independent variables (cyber security, IT expenditure, and innovation) and the dependent variable (economic growth).The results indicated that cyber security exerts a positive and considerable influence on economic growth, underscoring the necessity of establishing a safe digital environment to foster trust and stability.The effect of IT expenditure was favorable but not very big, which shows that spending efficiency varies from country to country.Innovation has a negative and substantial effect, which may be due to a difference between the results of innovation and how it is actually used in some nations .The study suggested that to maintain long-term growth, we should improve the efficiency of technology expenditure, build cyber security infrastructure, and try to close the gap between scientific research and the job market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it