MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413618388 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.18.670666

<i>Sleeping Beauty</i> mutagenesis identifies <i>BACH2</i> and other regulators of CD8 <sup>+</sup> T cell exhaustion, persistence <i>in vivo</i> , and CAR-T function under tumor-associated chronic antigen stimulation

2025· preprint· en· W4413618388 on OpenAlexaff
Alex T. Larsson, Tyler Jubenville, Wendy A. Hudson, Carli M. Stewart, Alexander K. Tsai, Adam L. Burrack, Erin E. Nolan, Zach J. Seeman, Yuling Yang, Christopher M. Stehn, Daryl M. Gohl, Margaret Donovan, Nuri A. Temiz, Flavia E. Popescu, Søren Warming, Somasekar Seshagiri, Yun You, Ingunn M. Stromnes, Saad S. Kenderian, David A. Largaespada

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsAdler
FundersKite PharmaGenentechNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsMutagenesisPersistence (discontinuity)BeautyFunction (biology)CD8In vivoBiologyT cellGeneticsCancer researchMutationCell biologyImmune systemPhilosophyGeneEngineeringEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genes that enhance T cell function represent promising targets for improving engineered T cell therapies for cancer. While extensive CRISPR knockout screens have identified key genes enhancing T cell persistence, employing Sleeping Beauty ( SB ) insertional mutagenesis, which induces both gain-(GOF) and loss-of-function (LOF) mutations via the generation of fusion transcripts with endogenous genes, may uncover additional critical factors that previous approaches have overlooked. We developed transgenic mice carrying D oxycycline (Dox)-inducible SB mutag e nesis s y stem (DiSBey) in primary T cells. Using DiSBey, we conducted screens for genetic alterations enhancing T cell persistence under chronic antigen exposure. Specifically, CD8⁺ T cells from Dox-fed DiSBey mice were subjected to repeated anti-CD3 stimulation over 18 days to mimic chronic antigenic stimulation. We then identified SB transposon genomic insertion sites and corresponding fusion transcripts from the persistent DiSBey CD8⁺ T cells using enhanced-specificity tagmentation sequencing (esTag-seq) and RNA-seq, respectively. Under chronic stimulation, SB -mutagenized CD8⁺ T cells exhibited improved persistence and reduced terminal exhaustion phenotype. Across six independent screens, we identified 38 genes that were recurrently targeted by the SB transposon T2/Onc2 and differentially expressed under chronic anti-CD3 stimulation stress. Among these, T2/Onc2 insertions into Bach2 and Elmo1 were repeatedly found at the genomic level and were associated with altered nascent transcript expression. Bach2 , known as a key regulator of T cell memory formation and resistance to chronic viral infection but less characterized in engineered T cells for cancer therapy, was found to enhance in vivo tumor persistence in the B16-Ova tumor model. We showed that ectopic Bach2 expression levels influence engineered T cell differentiation lineage. A Bach2 low signature allowed differentiation into both KLRG1⁺ and CD62L⁺ phenotypes, whereas Bach2 high restricted differentiation predominantly to the CD62L⁺ subset. Finally, in human CART19-28ζ cells, BACH2 overexpression enhanced cytotoxicity and improved tumor control following chronic cancer stimulation. Controllable SB mutagenesis using DiSBey mice provides a novel platform for functional screening of genes that improve T cell therapeutic phenotypes. Our findings highlight a dose-dependent role of BACH2 in enhancing the function of engineered T cells under conditions of chronic antigenic stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207