MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413636482 · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-24-0554.1

Seasonal ITCZ Control on ENSO Responses to Extratropical Volcanic Forcing

2025· article· en· W4413636482 on OpenAlexaff
Shih‐Wei Fang, Francesco S. R. Pausata, Roberta D’Agostino, Myriam Khodri, Davide Zanchettin, Claudia Timmreck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersInstitute for Basic ScienceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutsches Klimarechenzentrum
KeywordsExtratropical cycloneClimatologyForcing (mathematics)Intertropical Convergence ZoneEl Niño Southern OscillationEnvironmental scienceVolcanoGeologyMeteorologyGeographyPrecipitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The response of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) to a strong volcanic eruption is controlled by several mechanisms, including the spatial structure of the volcanic forcing. In the case of extratropical eruptions, a mechanism contributing to posteruption ENSO evolution involves the forced interhemispheric energy imbalance and the associated displacement of the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ). In this study, using 100 members of diverse (in locations and magnitude) idealized volcanic forcing ensembles from the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1-2-LR), we find that large (≥10-Tg sulfur) north and south extratropical eruptions lead to strong El Niño–like and weak La Niña–like responses in the second winter following the eruption, respectively. We demonstrate that the shifts of the ITCZ are the main drivers of the ENSO response. The weaker ENSO response for the south extratropical eruptions is due to contrasting westerly anomalies in the eastern Pacific from multiple local responses and easterly anomalies in the central Pacific directly from ITCZ displacement along the equator, thereby reducing the overall response. Furthermore, when separating the 100 members based on initial ENSO states, distinct ENSO responses are found, and significant differences in ENSO tendencies can be observed even 5 years after eruptions. This study stresses the importance of seasonal differences in ITCZ displacement when studying volcanic forcing and contributes to explain the inconsistency of ENSO responses to past volcanic events. Significance Statement In this study, we investigate whether different latitudinal locations of volcanic eruptions can result in distinct El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) responses by using large ensemble simulations. We find that the locations of the eruption and its emission strength can all lead to distinct ENSO-like responses, highlighting the importance of the changes in the position of the intertropical convergence zone in driving such responses. Our study enhances the dynamical understanding of ENSO-like responses to volcanic forcing, which may lead to better future predictions on volcanic impacts, better past volcanic reconstructions through climate records, and a new perspective on studying ENSO dynamics through interhemispheric energy transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ClimateSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207