MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413637334 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaf452

Role of Flotillin-1 In <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> Cell-to-Cell Spreading

2025· article· en· W4413637334 on OpenAlexafffund
Petra A McLeod, Julian A. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCaveolin-1 and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEndocytosisEndocytic cycleListeria monocytogenesCell biologyCellBiologyActinLipid raftSignal transductionGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Listeria monocytogenes spreads intercellularly by creating actin-rich projections that are endocytosed into recipient cells. Caveolin-mediated endocytosis has been implicated in this process, accounting for about 70% in cell-to-cell spread in cells depleted of caveolin-1. Thus, additional mechanisms may contribute to the remaining spread, and we examined the role of flotillin-based endocytosis. We found that flotillin-1 localized to L. monocytogenes invaginations in recipient cells and depletion of flotillin-1 significantly impaired bacterial transfer. Similarly, preventing endogenous flotillin-1 from membrane association significantly reduced bacterial spread. To evaluate whether there was interplay between flotillin-1- and caveolin-1-mediated endocytosis at L. monocytogenes invagination sites, we measured the area of spread in cells with both caveolin-1 and flotillin-1 knockdown and found a further significant decrease in spread and many cells with complete blockage. This work demonstrates that flotillin-based endocytosis is crucial for cell-to-cell spreading of L. monocytogenes and that this endocytic strategy can internalize large membrane protrusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicCaveolin-1 and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207