MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413637879 · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2025.103713

Experimental validation of an automated soil leachate monitoring system for agricultural Non-Point source pollution and nutrient run-off to water bodies

2025· article· en· W4413637879 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAin Shams Engineering Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHenan Agricultural University
KeywordsLeachateNonpoint source pollutionEnvironmental sciencePollutionNutrientAgricultureEnvironmental engineeringWater pollutionWaste managementWater resource managementAgricultural engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental chemistryEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite advancements, precise on-site measurement of agricultural non-point source pollution and its impact on water quality remains challenging. Existing systems face limitations in addressing spatial variability and temporal fluctuations and accurately capturing nutrient dynamics in water bodies. This study introduces an innovative automated monitoring framework to assess nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contributions from agricultural runoff. This research also presents an innovative mathematical modeling framework and experimental validation for an automated soil leachate collection system (ASLCS) designed to monitor agricultural non-point source pollution, particularly focusing on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) dynamics integrating soil water dynamics, pressure variations, and sensor responses. The model demonstrated exceptional accuracy in simulating soil water content across multiple depths (30, 60, and 90 cm) with remarkably low RMSE values of 0.0038, 0.0044, and 0.0036 m 3 /m 3 respectively. The soil leachate collection rates showed a strong correlation with soil water content (R 2 > 0.98 across all depths), with collection efficiency peaking at soil water contents above 0.28 m 3 /m 3 . Pressure dynamics analysis revealed sophisticated relationships between normalized pressure and volume (R 2 = 0.9911 and 0.9977), while ultrasonic level sensor performance demonstrated high measurement accuracy (R 2 = 0.9902) across operational ranges. The capability of the designed model to monitor nutrient concentrations showed exceptional precision, with validation results indicating high accuracy for NH 4 -N (R 2 = 0.9968, 0–10 mg/L range), NO 3 -N (R 2 = 0.9960, 0–20 mg/L range), and phosphorus (R 2 = 0.9943, 0–5 mg/L range). This integrated approach represented a significant advancement in automated monitoring technology, offering real-time, high-precision tracking of agricultural nutrient leaching while minimizing soil disruption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it