Green horizons: Sustainable global logistics in dynamic supply chain management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supply chain management in a global scale involves addressing numerous uncertainties, from demand fluctuations to unforeseen disruptions. Developing advanced solution approaches is critical to manage such complexities and ensure resilience. This study presents a multi-stage stochastic–dynamic model for the global supply chain, incorporating hedging policies. The aim is to identify optimal order scheduling for bill of materials, production planning, and inventory management across warehouses (i.e., materials and finished products). Due to the dynamic nature of the global supply chain (e.g., demand fluctuations, disruptions, and lead time), a multi-stage stochastic model is developed for the stochastic–dynamic supply chain network. To address dynamic factors of real-world global supply chain, an accelerated parallel stochastic dual dynamic integer programming (SDDiP) approach is proposed to deal with disruptions (e.g., political unrest, natural disasters, and pandemics), enhancing supply chain resiliency. To validate the proposed parallel SDDiP , various scenarios with different sizes are generated using the case study and compared to the SDDiP with Benders cuts and integrated stage-wise Lagrangian dual cut ( SWLDC ) (i.e., SDDiP-SWLDC ). According to the obtained results, the proposed parallel node strategy for accelerated SDDiP consistently outperforms the basic stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP) and demonstrated robust CPU scalability. Evaluation across various scenario sizes shows stochastic dual dynamic integer programming-mixed integer rounding cuts ( SDDiP-MIR ) achieving faster computation and a smaller 7% optimality gap compared to SDDiP-SWLDC and SDDiP in large-size instances, highlighting its superior performance in complex supply chain settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".