MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413640807 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2025.107226

Green horizons: Sustainable global logistics in dynamic supply chain management

2025· article· en· W4413640807 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahsa Mohammadi, Babak Mohamadpour Tosarkani

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Operations Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSupply chainSupply chain managementBusinessComputer scienceOperations researchMathematicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supply chain management in a global scale involves addressing numerous uncertainties, from demand fluctuations to unforeseen disruptions. Developing advanced solution approaches is critical to manage such complexities and ensure resilience. This study presents a multi-stage stochastic–dynamic model for the global supply chain, incorporating hedging policies. The aim is to identify optimal order scheduling for bill of materials, production planning, and inventory management across warehouses (i.e., materials and finished products). Due to the dynamic nature of the global supply chain (e.g., demand fluctuations, disruptions, and lead time), a multi-stage stochastic model is developed for the stochastic–dynamic supply chain network. To address dynamic factors of real-world global supply chain, an accelerated parallel stochastic dual dynamic integer programming (SDDiP) approach is proposed to deal with disruptions (e.g., political unrest, natural disasters, and pandemics), enhancing supply chain resiliency. To validate the proposed parallel SDDiP , various scenarios with different sizes are generated using the case study and compared to the SDDiP with Benders cuts and integrated stage-wise Lagrangian dual cut ( SWLDC ) (i.e., SDDiP-SWLDC ). According to the obtained results, the proposed parallel node strategy for accelerated SDDiP consistently outperforms the basic stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP) and demonstrated robust CPU scalability. Evaluation across various scenario sizes shows stochastic dual dynamic integer programming-mixed integer rounding cuts ( SDDiP-MIR ) achieving faster computation and a smaller 7% optimality gap compared to SDDiP-SWLDC and SDDiP in large-size instances, highlighting its superior performance in complex supply chain settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers & Operations ResearchSame topicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207