MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413652265 · doi:10.1177/03090892251350701

Ezekiel 29.6b–7 and metaphorical uses of canes in the Hebrew Bible

2025· article· en· W4413652265 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy Schipper

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for the Study of the Old Testament · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsEastern Ontario Training Board
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHebrew BiblePhilosophyLiteratureHebrewArtLinguisticsTheologyHistoryBiblical studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues that Ezekiel 29.6b–7 reflects an underappreciated metaphorical depiction of a cane, and that we can find metaphors involving canes elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible with Ezek. 29.6b–7 containing the most explicit example. These metaphors can be used to articulate warnings about the unreliability of alleged allies as well as the reliability of Yahweh. Other metaphors for God in the Hebrew Bible may be more familiar, but the metaphor discussed in this article suggests the need for further attention not only to the textual metaphorization of injured or disabled bodies but also to the objects that people with injuries or disabilities would have used to support themselves in the ancient world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for the Study of the Old TestamentSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207