MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413655247 · doi:10.3390/photonics12090854

Carbon Quantum Dot-Embedded SiO2: PMMA Hybrid as a Blue-Emitting Plastic Scintillator for Cosmic Ray Detection

2025· article· en· W4413655247 on OpenAlexaff
Lorena Cruz León, R. Palomino‐Merino, J.E. Espinosa, Samuel Tehuacanero-Cuapa, Benito de Celis Alonso, O. Martı́nez, Oliver I. Ruiz-Hernandez, José Gerardo Suárez-García, M. Toledo-Solano, Jesús Eduardo Lugo Arce

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorCosmic rayOptoelectronicsQuantum dotMaterials scienceCarbon fibersOpticsPhysicsDetectorAstrophysicsComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work reports the synthesis and characterization of Carbon Quantum Dots (CQDs) embedded in an organic–inorganic hybrid SiO2: PMMA matrix, designed as a novel plastic scintillator material. The CQDs were synthesized through a solvo-hydrothermal method and incorporated using a sol–gel polymerization process, resulting in a mechanically durable and optically active hybrid. Structural analysis with X-ray diffraction and TEM confirmed crystalline quantum dots approximately 10 nm in size. Extensive optical characterization, including band gap measurement, photoluminescence under 325 nm UV excitation, lifetime evaluations, and quantum yield measurement, revealed a blue emission centered at 426 nm with a decay time of 3–3.6 ns. The hybrid scintillator was integrated into a compact cosmic ray detector using a photomultiplier tube optimized for 420 nm detection. The system effectively detected secondary atmospheric muons produced by low-energy cosmic rays, validated through the vertical equivalent muon (VEM) technique. These findings highlight the potential of CQD-based hybrid materials for advanced optical sensing and scintillation applications in complex environments, supporting the development of compact and sensitive detection systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotonicsSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207