MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413656857 · doi:10.1177/09544070251359702

Experimental verification of nonlinear sliding mode observer for accurate estimation of vehicle sideslip angle and lateral tire forces

2025· article· en· W4413656857 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Razmjooei, Gianluca Palli, Salvatore Strano, Ciro Tordela, Mario Terzo, Mohammad Hossein Shafiei

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Mode (computer interface)Sliding mode controlComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the estimation of the sideslip angle and lateral tire-road forces for a class of nonlinear road vehicles. A Second-Order Sliding Mode Observer (SOSMO) is developed as an extended-state observer to simultaneously estimate lateral tire forces along with other measurable variables. The vehicle’s sideslip angle is then estimated independently using two distinct methods: dynamical equations and an inverse model-based estimation approach. The latter method introduces an innovative tire model that incorporates nonlinear tire-road friction characteristics, effectively simulating lateral force behavior. Comparative simulations and experimental analyses across two practical scenarios demonstrate that the proposed strategies, which do not require detailed tire-road interaction modeling, outperform conventional estimators such as the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and the State Dependent Riccati Equation Filter (SDREF). The experimental results particularly highlight the superior accuracy and efficiency of the developed SOSMO-based estimation strategies in providing estimates of the sideslip angle and lateral forces, offering reliable and cost-effective solutions compared to traditional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile EngineeringSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207