MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413677366 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2025.3602956

Transmission Time Minimization-Based UAV Deployment and Resource Allocation With Random User Position Information

2025· article· en· W4413677366 on OpenAlex
Rong Chai, Hong Chen, Lin He, Ruijin Sun, Qianbin Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSoftware deploymentMinificationComputer sciencePosition (finance)Resource allocationTransmission (telecommunications)Real-time computingResource (disambiguation)Distributed computingOperations researchComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringWorld Wide WebBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploiting unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in terrestrial cellular networks has received considerable attention for their advanced transmission capability, flexible deployment and cost effectiveness, etc. In certain communication scenarios where the links from ground users (GUs) to base stations (BSs) or satellites may not be accessible, UAVs can be deployed as aerial relays (ARs) to forward data packets for the GUs. In this paper, we investigate the AR deployment and resource allocation problem in a UAV-assisted satellite communication system. Stressing the importance of system transmission time, we formulate the joint AR deployment, power allocation and user association problem as a constrained system transmission time minimization problem. Since the formulated optimization problem is non-convex and non-linear with the AR deployment and user association variables being coupled, it is challenging to solve. To tackle this problem, the original optimization problem is decomposed into subproblems, namely AR deployment and power allocation subproblem, and user clustering and association subproblem. Given the initial user association strategy and the number of ARs, the AR deployment and power allocation subproblem is formulated and solved by using multi-agent deep Q network algorithm. Then, given the AR deployment and power allocation strategy, we formulate the user clustering and association subproblem and propose an improvedK-means-based user clustering and association algorithm. The two subproblems are tackled in an iterative and embedded manner. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it