MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413682584 · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2025.08.036

Invasive cancer cells soften collagen networks and disrupt stress-stiffening via volume exclusion, contractility and adhesion

2025· article· en· W4413682584 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Irène Nagle, Margherita Tavasso, Ankur Bordoloi, Iain Muntz, Gijsje H. Koenderink, Pouyan E. Boukany

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Biomaterialia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsUniversiteit LeidenEuropean Research CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeConvergence
KeywordsMaterials scienceContractilityAdhesionStiffeningCancerStress (linguistics)Composite materialMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collagen networks form the structural backbone of the extracellular matrix in both healthy and cancerous tissues, exhibiting nonlinear mechanical properties that crucially regulate tissue mechanics and cell behavior. Here, we investigate how the presence of invasive breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) influences the polymerization kinetics and mechanics of collagen networks using bulk shear rheology and rheo-confocal microscopy. We show that embedded cancer cells delay the onset of collagen polymerization due to volume exclusion effects. During polymerization, the cells (at 4% volume fraction) cause an unexpected time-dependent softening of the network. We show that this softening effect arises from active remodeling via adhesion and contractility rather than from proteolytic degradation. At higher cell volume fractions, the dominant effect of the cells shifts to volume exclusion, causing a two-fold reduction of network stiffness. Additionally, we demonstrate that cancer cells suppress the characteristic stress-stiffening response of collagen. This effect (partially) disappears when cell adhesion and contractility are inhibited, and it is absent when the cells are replaced by passive hydrogel particles. These findings provide new insights into how active inclusions modify the mechanics of fibrous networks, contributing to a better understanding of the role of cells in the mechanics of healthy and diseased tissues like invasive tumors. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding how cells influence tissue mechanics is crucial to unravel disease progression. While fibroblasts are known to stiffen tissues, the role of invasive cancer cells is less clear. Using collagen-based tissue models, we reveal that cancer cells unexpectedly soften the collagen matrix and disrupt its stress-stiffening response. By comparing active cells to passive particles and selectively blocking cell functions, we show that volume exclusion, adhesion, and contractility each play distinct roles in shaping tissue mechanics. This work sheds light on the physical impact of cancer cells on their environment, advancing our understanding on how cells dynamically alter the mechanical properties of tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa BiomaterialiaSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207