MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413683092 · doi:10.3390/mi16090977

Push–Push Electrothermal MEMS Actuators with Si-to-Si Contact for DC Power Switching Applications

2025· article· en· W4413683092 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdurrashid Hassan Shuaibu, Almur A. S. Rabih, Yves Blaquière, Frédéric Nabki

Bibliographic record

VenueMicromachines · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicroelectromechanical systemsActuatorMaterials sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringOptoelectronicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MEMS switches offer great advantages over solid-state and conventional electromechanical switches, including a compact size and high isolation. This paper presents a novel silicon-to-silicon (Si-to-Si) MEMS switch featuring two suspended actuated platforms for DC power switching applications. The proposed design uniquely incorporates dual suspended chevron actuators, enabling bidirectional actuation, enhancing force generation, and improving overall switching performance. Leveraging the robustness of silicon, this Si-to-Si contact switch aims to enhance the reliability of MEMS-based DC power switches. Testing of a fabricated device in the PiezoMUMPs process demonstrated that a 2 μm initial contact gap closes at 1.1 VDC, with a total actuation power of 246 mW. The switch exhibits a linear voltage–current response up to 5 mA of switching current and achieves a minimum contact resistance of ~294 ± 2 Ω, one of the lowest reported for Si-to-Si contacts. This low contact resistance is attributed to the suspended contact platforms, which mitigate misalignment. The measured response time was 4 ms for turn-on and 2.5 ms for turn-off. This switch withstood a breakdown voltage of up to 376 V across the 2 µm contact gap. Moreover, the 200 nm thick oxide layer separating the actuation and signal lines exhibited breakdown at 183 V. These findings highlight the potential of the switch for high-voltage applications and pave the way for further enhancements to improve its reliability in harsh environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicromachinesSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207