MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413695309 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.19.670934

Engineering anaerobic fungal-bacterial consortia for direct conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into medium-chain fatty acids

2025· preprint· en· W4413695309 on OpenAlexafffund
Byung-Chul Kim, Elaina M. Blair, J. Howard, Ian Mateus Gois, Robert Flick, Stephen J. Mondo, Jasmyn Pangilinan, Anna Lipzen, Jie Guo, Hope Hundley, Raymond Lee, Jayson Talag, Victoria Bunting, Shanmugam Rajasekar, Kerrie Barry, Igor V. Grigoriev, Michelle O’Malley, Christopher E. Lawson

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBiological and Environmental ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyInstitute for Collaborative BiotechnologiesOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)Lignocellulosic biomassProduction (economics)Pulp and paper industryChemistryFood scienceFermentationBiologyAgronomyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lignocellulosic biomass is a renewable feedstock for sustainable fuels and chemicals, yet industrial conversion remains constrained by carbohydrate solubilization. Inspired by herbivore rumen microbiomes, we engineered an anaerobic fungal-bacterial consortium converting native lignocellulose into medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) without pretreatment. Systematic screening identified a newly isolated anaerobic fungus, Neocallimastix sp. FC1, in co-culture with Megasphaera hexanoica as a top-performing pair, achieving a lignocellulose-to-MCFA yield of 21.0 % (carbon-to-carbon basis) through tight lactate cross-feeding without competition for soluble sugars. Because fungal lactate production rate constrained the growth of M. hexanoica , the bacterium reallocated protein from growth toward chain elongation, resulting in increased MCFAs production over butyrate. These results demonstrate that high lignocellulose-to-MCFA conversion by the consortium requires high lactate-producing capability and operating regimes sustaining low lactate concentrations at high flux. Technoeconomic analysis further identifies the cost and yield thresholds required for economically viable deployment, establishing quantitative design targets for pretreatment-free fungal-bacterial lignocellulose upgrading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversion→French-language works237,207→