MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413722840 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.24.25334320

Context-Aware Digital Phenotyping of Youth Mental Health Using Mobile Ecological Prospective Assessments of Smartphone Use

2025· preprint· en· W4413722840 on OpenAlexaff
Jamin Patel, Sheriff Tolulope Ibrahim, Tarun Reddy Katapally

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Mental healthSmartphone applicationPsychologyInternet privacyEnvironmental healthComputer scienceGeographyMedicinePsychiatryMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Youth mental disorders affect 12-14% of adolescents globally and remain underdiagnosed and undertreated. Digital phenotyping offers a scalable approach to real-time behavioural monitoring via smartphones, yet most studies rely solely on passive measures such as screen time, overlooking contextual factors. Methods This cross-sectional study was part of the Smart Platform, a digital citizen science initiative that engaged youth aged 13-21 years. Participants completed a baseline survey on sociodemographic characteristics and mental health (depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation). Over the next seven days, context-aware digital phenotyping was conducted, defined as the collection of ecologically valid, time-stamped behavioural data from personal devices. This was implemented through mobile ecological prospective assessments (mEPAs) to capture self-reported smartphone use context, including activity type, location, and social setting. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between smartphone use context and mental health, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. Results Eighty-four youth completed the baseline survey and at least one mEPA. A higher proportion of smartphone use at home was associated with lower odds of depression (OR=0.105, 95% CI: 0.028-0.276) and anxiety (OR=0.150, 0.053-0.345). A greater proportion of smartphone use while alone was associated with higher odds of depression (OR=3.802, 1.622-11.241), as was a greater proportion of time spent internet surfing (OR=2.663, 1.238-6.843). Longer duration of smartphone use outside the home was associated with higher odds of depression (OR=4.289, 1.443-16.579). Conclusion Context-aware smartphone metrics may offer more informative digital phenotyping indicators of youth mental health than duration alone, supporting integration of multi-context measures into early detection and precision prevention frameworks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicMental Health Research Topics→French-language works237,207→