MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413734234 · doi:10.1007/s10980-025-02203-z

Characterizing landscape configuration effects on eastern spruce budworm infestation dynamics

2025· article· en· W4413734234 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tommaso Trotto, Nicholas C. Coops, Alexis Achim, Sarah E. Gergel, Dominik Röeser

Bibliographic record

VenueLandscape Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLandscape ecologySpruce budwormNature ConservationInfestationGeographyEcologyLandscape architectureForestryBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaHabitatBotanyTortricidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: , (L.) Mill.) at the stand level. At the landscape level, the ability of SBW to disperse over long distances suggests that the configuration of available resources may also play an important role in affecting infestation success and outcomes. Objectives: We hypothesized that fragmented landscapes characterized by smaller and more dispersed conifer patches intermixed with other land cover types may promote infestations thanks to the ability of SBW to saturate the landscape and avidly consume limited resources. To test our hypothesis, we investigated to what degree landscape configuration plays a significant role in modulating defoliations using spectrally-segmented forest stands. Next, we determined the major drivers of infestation probabilities and how they have evolved as a result of landscape configuration changes. Methods: We capitalized on a combination of Landsat imagery, Forest Resource Inventory (FRI) data, and probability estimates from random forest models to investigate multi-scale effects of landscape configuration on SBW infestations over 13 years in eastern Quebec, Canada, in a spatially-explicit fashion. Based on annual best available pixel composites of surface reflectance derived from Landsat, we superimposed a 400 m tessellation over which we extracted six landscape configuration metrics describing area, aggregation, and shape for infested and non-infested conifer forest patches. Next, probability estimates from two sets of random forest models were extracted from the configuration metrics at annual time steps and for the entire length of the time series. Results: Landscapes characterized by greater fragmentation of conifer patches had a higher risk of infestation. In such landscapes, greater fragmentation was indicated by smaller and more variable-sized conifer patches, with a mean patch area < 40 ha (CV > 100 ha) and a landscape patch index < 50 %. In addition, such areas had more isolated patches and more complex shapes, as indicated by cohesion < 97 %, landscape shape index > 3, and shape > 1.35. The landscape patch index, quantifying the percentage of landscape covered by the largest coniferous patch, had the greatest influence on SBW infestations. These results confirmed our initial hypothesis that a higher level of fragmentation of conifer patches may favor infestation establishment. Conclusions: We demonstrated the use of freely available Landsat imagery to extract configuration metrics in a spatially-explicit fashion. Further, we highlighted the value of using probability estimates to capture landscape configurations at higher risk of infestations. This knowledge can inform forest management practices, such as where harvesting operations may be carried out on the landscape or where planting may be prioritized to reduce conifer stand fragmentation and infestation risk. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-025-02203-z.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLandscape EcologySame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207