MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413735136 · doi:10.4153/s0008439525100805

Integer solutions of the generalized polynomial Pell equations and their finiteness: The quadratic case

2025· article· en· W4413735136 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ekata Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInteger (computer science)Quadratic equationPolynomialQuadratic functionPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Determining the polynomials $D \in {\mathbb Z}[x]$ such that the polynomial Pell equation ${P^2-DQ^2=1}$ has nontrivial solutions $P,Q$ in ${\mathbb Q}[x]$ (and in ${\mathbb Z}[x]$ ) is an open question. In this article, we consider the generalized polynomial Pell equation $P^2-DQ^2=n$ , where $D \in {\mathbb Z}[x]$ is a monic quadratic polynomial and n is a nonzero integer. For $n=1$ , such an equation always has nontrivial solutions in ${\mathbb Q}[x]$ , but for a non-square integer n , the generalized polynomial Pell equation $P^2-DQ^2=n$ may not always have a solution in ${\mathbb Q}[x]$ . Depending on n , we determine the polynomials $D=x^2+cx+d$ , for which the equation $P^2-DQ^2=n$ has nontrivial solutions in ${\mathbb Q}[x]$ and in ${\mathbb Z}[x]$ . Taking $n=-1$ , this allows us to solve the negative polynomial Pell equation completely for any such D . An interesting feature is that there are certain polynomials D for which the generalized polynomial Pell equation has nontrivial solutions in ${\mathbb Z}[x]$ , but only finitely many, whereas the solutions in ${\mathbb Q}[x]$ are infinitely many. Finally, we determine the monic quadratic polynomials D for which the solutions of $P^2-DQ^2=n$ in ${\mathbb Z}[x]$ exhibit this finiteness phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207