MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413735915 · doi:10.33137/utmj.v102i2.43845

Darier-Ferrand Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: A Rare Soft Tissue Tumor Of The Breast And A Review Of The Literature

2025· article· en· W4413735915 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baran Demir, Mehmet Tolga Kafadar, Sadullah Girgin

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermatofibrosarcoma protuberansDermatofibrosarcomaMedicineDermatologySoft tissuePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cases where a mass in the breast is diagnosed and a tru-cut or excisional biopsy is performed, mesenchymal lesions are rarely encountered. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a rare mesenchymal tumour originating from the dermis in clinical practice. It is generally a low-grade sarcoma and rarely metastasizes. Other malignant mesenchymal lesions observed in the breast include leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, chondrosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, spindle cell mesenchymal tumour, and angiosarcoma. Primary mesenchymal tumours of the breast make up less than 1% of all breast malignancies. In this report, a 38-year-old female patient with a painless mass measuring approximately 7x6 cm, protruding from the upper inner quadrant of the right breast, was presented. The tru-cut biopsy performed on the lesion revealed a spindle cell mesenchymal tumour. A PET-CT scan showed a mass with increased SUV-max in the right breast and reactive lymph nodes in the right axilla. No distant metastasis was observed. The patient underwent a wide local excision with a 1 cm clear surgical margin. She was discharged on the 2nd postoperative day without complications. The pathology result of the main specimen was dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, with negative surgical margins, and the patient was placed under clinical and radiological follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Medical JournalSame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207