Nonlinear Spectroscopy via Generalized Quantum Phase Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Response theory has a successful history of connecting experimental observations with theoretical predictions. Of particular interest is the optical response of matter, from which spectroscopy experiments can be modelled. However, the calculation of response properties for quantum systems is often prohibitively expensive, especially for nonlinear spectroscopy, as it requires access to either the time evolution of the system or to excited states. In this work, we introduce a generalized quantum phase estimation framework designed for multi-variate phase estimation. This allows the treatment of general correlation functions enabling the recovery of response properties of arbitrary orders. The generalized quantum phase estimation circuit has an intuitive construction that is linked with a physical process of interest, and can directly sample frequencies from the distribution that would be obtained experimentally. In addition, we provide a single-ancilla modification of the new framework for early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Overall, our framework enables the efficient simulation of spectroscopy experiments beyond the linear regime, such as Raman spectroscopy, having that the circuit cost grows linearly with respect to the order of the target nonlinear response. This opens up an exciting new field of applications for quantum computers with potential technological impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".