MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413741708 · doi:10.1186/s12920-025-02161-0

Tracking of multidrug-resistant pathogen clones in Ghana: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4413741708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Odoom, Eric S. Donkor

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Genomics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Ghana
KeywordsMeta-analysisHuman geneticsBiologyMultiple drug resistancePathogenComputational biologyVirologyGeneticsBioinformaticsMedicineDrug resistanceGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens effective antibiotic treatment. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial clones pose a particular challenge because they facilitate rapid resistance dissemination. Tracking dominant antibiotic-resistant clones in Ghana will inform targeted surveillance and control. This systematic review characterised prevalent MDR clones of priority pathogens isolated from humans, animals, and the environment in Ghana. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted from inception to October 4, 2024, for studies reporting genetic characterisation of MDR clones from Ghana. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS), and data analysis involved descriptive statistics and proportional meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria, and 10 different MDR bacterial species were identified from human, animal, and environmental sources. The pooled prevalence of MDR bacteria was 53.4% (95% CI: 39.8–66.9). The dominant E. coli clones were ST155 (38.0%), ST617 (29.1%), and ST10 (11.1%). For K. pneumoniae, ST152 and ST17 were the main clones detected, each with a prevalence of 13.7%. ST39 was also present at 9.0%. The major S. pneumoniae clones were ST802 (18.5%), ST15111 (12.3%), and ST15448 (4.8%). ST152 (27.3%), ST121 (21.3%), and ST9 (14.3%) were predominant among the S. aureus isolates. The most prevalent Acinetobacter baumannii clone was ST231 (77.3%), followed by ST2145 (13.6%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review provided the first comprehensive overview of MDR clones that may be circulating in Ghana. The identification of high-risk clones, such as E. coli ST155 and S. aureus ST152, highlights the need for urgent public health interventions. Continued tracking using standardised WGS methodologies across diverse sources is crucial for guiding antimicrobial resistance containment in Ghana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.024
Bibliometrics0.0110.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical GenomicsSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207