MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413743190 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200712

Integrating NTL Imagery and Environmental Indicators for Poverty Mapping in India: An Approach Toward SDG-1

2025· article· en· W4413743190 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pragati Khare, Dipti Jadhav

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyEnvironmental scienceNatural resource economicsEconomicsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and timely poverty estimation is fundamental for the formulation of effective policies aimed at eradicating poverty in accordance with Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG-1).Traditional methods such as censuses and household surveys, though widely adopted, are limited by infrequency, high costs, and potential reporting errors.In contrast, satellite-derived data offer scalable and cost-effective alternatives.In this study, district-level poverty in Madhya Pradesh, India, was estimated using a Deep Learning (DL) framework that leverages Night-Time Light (NTL) satellite imagery in conjunction with environmental variablesspecifically the Air Quality Index (AQI) and radiance intensity.Two modeling strategies were employed.First, a baseline approach was implemented using a pre-trained Squeeze-and-Excitation Network (SENet) architecture to extract visual features from NTL imagery, followed by classification via three Machine Learning (ML) algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).Second, a modified SENet-154 model was developed by integrating structured environmental features (AQI and radiance) directly into the classification pipeline, enabling joint learning from both visual and environmental modalities.The modified SENet-154 model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 93.60%.Spatial autocorrelation analysis, conducted using Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), confirmed the geographical coherence of the predicted poverty clusters across districts, thereby validating the model's spatial reliability.The findings underscore the utility of NTL imagery as a proxy for socio-economic assessment and highlight the substantial gains in predictive accuracy obtained through the incorporation of environmental indicators.This integrative approach not only enhances the spatial granularity of poverty mapping but also emphasizes the interconnectedness of environmental degradation and economic deprivation.The results provide compelling evidence to support the design of policy interventions that concurrently address environmental sustainability and poverty alleviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207